Comprehensive Overview of Immigration Law (COIL) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Comprehensive Overview of Immigration Law Test. Utilize flashcards and multiple-choice questions, all with hints and detailed explanations. Achieve success in your examination journey!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What issues pertain to Archibald after he re-entered the U.S. without inspection?

Inadmissibility under INA § 212(a)(9)(A), but not other provisions.
Only inadmissibility under INA § 212(a)(9)(C).
Reinstatement of removal is not applicable.
Multiple inadmissibility grounds including reinstatement may apply.

The correct answer is: Multiple inadmissibility grounds including reinstatement may apply.

The situation involving Archibald after re-entering the U.S. without inspection raises various legal concerns related to immigration policy. Specifically, multiple grounds of inadmissibility can be triggered by such actions. When an individual enters the U.S. without proper inspection, they may face inadmissibility under several sections of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). This can include provisions related to unlawful presence, which is outlined in INA § 212(a)(9)(A), and also the bar on re-entry found in INA § 212(a)(9)(C). Additionally, when a person who has previously been removed from the U.S. attempts to re-enter illegally, they may be subject to reinstatement of removal, a process that can occur regardless of other inadmissibility grounds. Thus, multiple inadmissibility grounds, including those for reinstatement of a previous removal order, could apply to Archibald's case. This comprehensive view underscores the complexity of immigration law, highlighting the interplay between various provisions and the serious implications of unauthorized re-entry.